Dividends rough daft
This is a rough draft. Please note the editing.
I will put in a chart to help make your point.
We need a link to the free trial---are you still offering that?
A picture of you. A very short description of your company and a the link you want to use back to your website.
I am going to put a thumbnail of your picture and your very short description of your comany, along with the url in a table so it looks kinda like a banner. Give you some ethos. Or you could send me your own banner with pic and description if you have it. if not i will sell you the one i will make for you for $36.66.
The Critical Importance of Dividends
By Steve Cook (put banner in here)
So how do like your growth stocks now?
Many of my friends who are nearing retirement would agree.
“I was going to retire next year but my 401K is down (fill in your number) percent; so I am now going to have to work for anothe (X) years.”There is a lesson here -- over the long term, rising stock prices on average have provided a larger component of total equity return than dividend yield, you live in the short term. (editor note: i have no idea what this sentence means)
- Assume you had a $1,000,000 portfolio in October of 2007 and you thought you could make everything your were going to need by making good returns.
- You owned a lot of low yield and non dividend paying stocks and your portfolio yielded 1.5%.
- Let’s assume you were either withdrawing or expected to withdraw sometime in the future--$50,000 annually ($15,000 from dividends, $35,000 from capital gains).
- Expecting your portfolio to produce a 5% annual income was not an unreasonable expectation at the time.
- It is likely that your million dollar portfolio has fallen to $500,000-$600,000.
- If you take $50,000 out of capital to spend, you now need your portfolio to produce an 8-10% annual return. ($50,000/$500,000 - $600,000).
- Are 8-10% returns reasonable or are you more likely to exhaust your retirement account long before you die?
- You had the same $1,000,000 portfolio.
- You needed or expected to need the same $50,000 annual income from your portfolio.
- You decided to structured your portfolio with dividend paying stocks and sufficient bonds so that it produced $50,000 annually.
- Where would you be in 2009?
- Your portfolio is worth less; but your income hasn’t been impacted.
- Indeed, if you owned stocks that raised their dividends every year, your income would have grown between 2007 and 2009 and would be greater than $50,000.
In stock land, a growing stream of income only comes from one source--companies that raise their dividends consistently.If properly implemented and accompanied by a very strict Buy/Sell discipline, the dividend strategy can produce a growing stream of income and a competitive capital performance.
- To set goals and control outcomes--an annual income stream of $50,000 for example.
- Rely on a dividend streams to fund retirment; rather than relying on the direction of the market over the long term. (see the S and P 500 Chart)
- To sleep at night as the DJIA goes from 14,000 to 7,000 (because dividend income is the name of the game--not market speculation).
- Have never cut their dividend.
- Have raised their dividends in at least 7 out of 10 years.
- This allows us to remove companies with weak financial statements and companies that are at risk of paying the dividend--from our universe of candidate stocks.
- We don’t overpay for a stock.
- We identify those stocks that no longer fit our strick criteria.
- And that we remove exisiting portfolio stocks from our ownership list (at a gain or loss), and replace those companies with stocks that better fit our overall strategy and objectives. (we need to fix this section>
- Our longest lived portfolio is beating the S&P 500 by 600 basis points a year.
- The beta is .62.
- The alpha 4+ .
We need to put a hard close here with a link to the offering.







Post a Comment